Settlement substrate
Chain 978
The FEN protocol lane is scoped for low-cost settlement, builder access, work accounting, and public continuity signals that AI teams can evaluate without seeing privileged operations.
FENprotocol
FENprotocol frames Fenrua as a technical hosting candidate for AI projects that need affordable settlement, explicit support workflows, accountable public evidence, and a disciplined separation between the FEN protocol chain and the N/P-521 research chain. The page is intentionally evidence-first: Chain 978, Chain 521, FENiOS, FENtrust, and the FEN token-state rules are presented as separate parts of one system model rather than one vague participation narrative.
Settlement substrate
Chain 978
The FEN protocol lane is scoped for low-cost settlement, builder access, work accounting, and public continuity signals that AI teams can evaluate without seeing privileged operations.
Receipt layer
P-FEN
FENpresale uses a non-transferable receipt token so public copy can describe contribution state, burn-to-claim behavior, and cliff-based unlocks without implying liquid presale FEN.
Coordination layer
FENiOS
The protocol OS concept gives AI builders a structured work surface for requirements, evidence, support context, and release sequencing rather than a disconnected token narrative.
Research isolation
Chain 521
The N/P-521 research lane has its own chain identity and block progress, keeping experimental cryptographic evidence separated from the FEN support chain.
Live RPC continuity
FENprotocol keeps both public RPC continuity lanes visible across the full page while preserving their separate roles: Chain 978 for FEN protocol support, Chain 521 for N/P-521 research evidence. Last refresh: pending
Reading public block progress...
Public chain surface
Latest block
Reading
Sample move
+0
Chain ID
978
Public block read is pending; this card updates when the current block is returned.
Public chain surface
Latest block
Reading
Sample move
+0
Chain ID
521
Public block read is pending; this card updates when the current block is returned.
Why Fenrua Exists
AI projects need low-cost settlement, public evidence, workflow support, and chain-aware operating context, but most crypto infrastructure either hides trust assumptions or collapses unrelated claims into token marketing.
Fenrua separates protocol support, presale receipt accounting, N/P-521 research, economic continuity policy, and AI workflow intelligence into distinct public surfaces.
Chain 978 carries the FEN support-chain thesis, Chain 521 carries the N/P-521 research-chain thesis, FENiOS coordinates evidence-aware AI project review, and FENtrust keeps public claims tied to source evidence.
Abstract 1. Section Abstract
This section treats FENprotocol as the system model for the public site. Its purpose is to prove that Fenrua can describe a complex chain system without compressing receipt state, claimed-token state, reward state, support-chain state, and research state into one ambiguous participation story. The method is deliberately formal: every public claim is assigned to a lane, every lane has admissible evidence, and every downstream action has a precondition.
Protocol method: define state first, then attach evidence, then state the boundary.
Research Question 1. RQ-P-01
The minimal machine is source-value intake, P-FEN receipt issuance, burn-to-claim scheduling, claimed FEN inventory, reward branch, and N research migration branch.
Research Question 2. RQ-P-02
Chain 978 owns FEN support, hosting, settlement, and work-accounting claims; Chain 521 owns N/P-521 research, vector, circuit, and release-gate claims.
Research Question 3. RQ-P-03
FENiOS is treated as a coordination layer that binds project context, token state, chain state, source evidence, and protected-execution boundaries into review artifacts.
| Claim | Statement | Evidence | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formal Claim 1. FC-P-01 | FENprotocol is a stateful protocol map, not a single token page. | The section diagram names source value, P-FEN, burn receipt, Chain 978, FENpool, and N521 as ordered nodes. | The page does not imply that receipt state, reward eligibility, and research migration are simultaneously available. |
| Formal Claim 2. FC-P-02 | Chain 978 and Chain 521 are separate evidence lanes. | The combined block-progress panel is accompanied by lane-specific definitions and separate section links. | A Chain 521 research receipt cannot validate a Chain 978 hosting claim unless the dependency is separately shown. |
| Formal Claim 3. FC-P-03 | Public protocol trust is source-backed and boundary-backed. | The page routes to FENtrust for source excerpts, hashes, report outcomes, public statement source, and full source panels. | Source-backed public proof does not expose private execution, custody, validator, or reserve controls. |
Invariant 1. INV-P-01
Copy, flow nodes, and section links keep P-FEN in the receipt layer until burn-to-claim mechanics are described.
Invariant 2. INV-P-02
Chain IDs, labels, block-progress panels, and section boundaries keep 978 and 521 claims assigned to their lane.
Invariant 3. INV-P-03
The section describes observability, source proof, and readiness while excluding private operator and protected execution controls.
Invariant 4. INV-P-04
FENpool is described only after unlocked and claimed FEN, with P-FEN and unclaimed FEN explicitly excluded.
| Row | Artifact | Observation | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence Row 1. P-01 | lib/site.ts | Defines the public token-flow summary and allowed verification vocabulary. | Language configuration is a public-claim control, not a smart-contract proof by itself. |
| Evidence Row 2. P-02 | components/nexus/live-chain-progress-dashboard.tsx | Renders live progress for Chain 978 and Chain 521 while preserving chain-specific labels. | Block progress proves liveness signals, not unrestricted safety or economic adequacy. |
| Evidence Row 3. P-03 | components/nexus/engineering-flow-map.tsx | Presents the state machine as ordered nodes with claim-specific details. | The diagram is an explanatory artifact and must stay consistent with source-level evidence. |
protocol flow diagram
This diagram is the public engineering grammar for the protocol: it shows how a user-facing route moves from supported source value into a presale receipt, then into unlocked FEN, and only then into downstream protocol branches. The diagram is intentionally strict because most trust failures in token interfaces come from collapsing receipt state, locked state, reward eligibility, and research migration into one ambiguous sentence.
support chain
978 / 0x3d2
FEN protocol hosting, work settlement, support posture, and public block progress.
research chain
521 / 0x209
N/P-521 evidence lane with independent block progress and release boundary.
receipt token
P-FEN
Non-transferable presale receipt before burn-to-claim FEN settlement.
claim branch
FENpool / N
Unlocked FEN can move into rewards or published burn-to-mint migration logic.
The combined protocol page can show both chain progress panels, but the claims remain separated: Chain 978 is the FEN support chain, and Chain 521 is the N/P-521 research chain.
FEN token-state discipline is a section inside the larger Fenrua thesis. FENswap brings supported external source assets into a stablecoin-value quote. The quote returns a P-FEN receipt for the FENpresale path. P-FEN is a non-transferable ERC-20 presale receipt token. When the presale ends, users burn P-FEN into the presale contract to claim unlocked presale FEN according to the published cliff schedule. Only unlocked and claimed FEN can then move into later protocol choices: N migration under published burn rules or FENpool rewards.
hosting thesis
AI project hosting needs a settlement surface where gas cost, access review, support workload, and evidence publication are designed as a single operational surface rather than scattered across unrelated dashboards.
Fenrua’s public posture is strongest when every participation claim is attached to source excerpts, hashes, report outcomes, chain IDs, token-flow constraints, and live block progress that a technical reviewer can inspect before interacting.
The two-chain framing is deliberate: Chain 978 carries the FEN protocol support economy, while Chain 521 carries N/P-521 research evidence, and the public UI must preserve that boundary so hosting readiness and cryptographic research are not conflated.
FENiOS gives the protocol a coordination grammar for AI builders: project intake, work specification, access-review context, release state, support escalation, and evidence publication all become visible concepts without exposing protected execution infrastructure.
Public pages show chain identifiers, block progress, contract names, curated source evidence, report hashes, token-flow rules, and legal boundaries.
Public pages do not expose private control paths, privileged procedures, reserve actions, validator credentials, or protected execution surfaces.
The protocol language keeps FEN, P-FEN, FENpool, and N521 in distinct roles so a reader can understand what is a receipt, what is claimed FEN, what is reward-eligible, and what remains research-gated.
Source excerpts, report hashes, public trust language, and token-flow constraints are placed before participation copy so technical readers can verify claims before they evaluate access.
The support chain is presented as the low-fee protocol lane for AI hosting, FEN settlement, builder support, and live continuity evidence.
The research chain is presented as a separate N/P-521 evidence lane with its own block progress, release boundary, and cryptographic research vocabulary.